unconvinced by WADL

Wednesday, 3 May, 2006

I remain thoroughly unconvinced by WADL. I accept there’s a (current) corporate need to over-describe everything in XML, but quite frankly I’d rather describe my REST resources with HTTP OPTIONS plus extended http headers and/or, preferably, human-readable (and also machine parseable) xhtml, ala microformats.

Interestingly, I find no mention of WADL on rest-discuss. Crappy yahoo search algorithm? Or just “phasers set to ignore”?

Leave a Reply